What does plunder mean in government?

In the context of government, plunder is the use of the resources of a country for private gain, usually for the benefit of a small group of people. This is distinct from taxation, which is the compulsory transfer of resources from one group to another to fund a government's activities. While taxation is a legitimate function of government, plunder is not.

What does the word plunder mean in English?

The word plunder was used by the Old Testament writers to describe the stealing of property by enemy forces during war. The original meaning was “to strip,” and later it was used for the illegal hoarding of wealth. Plunder was not a crime in England until the 17th century when Parliament created the offence of “pillage.”

What does plunder mean in a sentence?

Plunder is defined as the illegal use of government funds or resources for personal gain. It has been a crime since ancient times and often was used by rulers to fund their campaigns. Plunder can include the misuse of funds or property, such as when a government official embezzles money to fund his or her lifestyle. Another form of plunder is when a government official or legislator amends or enacts a law or regulation in order to benefit his or her own company or organization.

What does the word plunder mean in English in a sentence?

Plunder is defined as the theft of property from an individual or a group, often by force or violence. It can apply to individuals, private property, or even natural resources. Sometimes plunder is committed by a government itself, which is one reason why a bad economy can be a threat to personal security. Sometimes a government will use its power to take property by force or coercion, and this is called expropriation.

What does plunder mean in Shakespeare?

Scrooge is a great example of a Shakespearean protagonist who is shown to be involved in plundering. He is the owner of an ironworks, which he exploits for years by paying his workers less than a living wage and forcing them to work long hours for long periods under poor conditions. Now, he becomes rich by saving a few of the poor people he mistreated. He justifies his actions by claiming that the money he saved from his exploitation of the poor is actually stolen from them. If